Os vídeos coletados pelas câmeras corporais da polícia militar do estado de São Paulo: sua interpretação como meio de prova em um estudo de caso

Abstract

This dissertation examines the use of videos recorded by body-worn cameras of the Military Police of the State of São Paulo as evidence in criminal proceedings, based on the understanding that such recordings are not neutral representations of reality but discursive constructions subject to different interpretations. Through a case study, it analyzes the argumentative strategies employed by the Public Prosecutor's Office, the Public Defender's Office, and the Judiciary, focusing particularly on how video evidence is articulated with other elements of proof. The research is guided by the following questions: “How is bodyworn camera video evidence discussed in criminal proceedings?” and “Compared to other forms of evidence, what types of argumentation are used to validate or challenge video footage?” Grounded in legal argumentation theory, the epistemology of criminal evidence, and textual linguistics, the analysis demonstrates that the persuasive strength of video depends on the narrative in which it is embedded. The study seeks to understand how bodyworn camera footage is presented and debated within the criminal process, and specifically how it is either strengthened or undermined in relation to other evidence, identifying the rhetorical strategies used to legitimize, contest, or cast doubt on its probative value.