Potencialidades e limites da territorialidade camponesa agroecológica frente à insustentabilidade do capital

Abstract

The debate about sustainability has been ruled by different elements over time, including technical, economic, social, environmental and in the context of the capital metabolism concerns takes different approaches ranging from reformism to the processes that link to their resilience. The objective is to verify the limits of such understandings through a literature search on the subject from work category understood as a relationship between man and nature and mediated technique for a given sociability that transforms throughout the historical processuality. It appears as if the work has historically effected in capitalist society articulated to the reproduction of capital through the exploitation of labor power. In the field, because of uneven and combined development of capitalism, beyond the extraction of surplus value from the rural proletariat, the ratio of capital and the peasantry is through the expropriation of peasant land income, which enables the update of the forms of capital accumulation. Based on different forms of expropriation of surplus through the exploitation of labor metabolism capital shows its founding unsustainability. Opposed to this structural unsustainability of the capitalist mode of production puts up the metabolism while peasant society and nature work based on the meaning of coevolution. Contrast that develops as both spatial and class conflict, characterized as territorial bickering, in which the peasantry can develop identities of legitimation, resistance or project of overcoming the capitalist sociability. The limits and potential of agroecological peasant identity project are checked against farmers and agro-ecological studies based on work with a sense of coevolution.